Practice question
A former Filipino lawyer submits an IBP good-standing certificate but no proof of citizenship reacquisition. He argues the certificate itself supplies nationality under Rule138. Which is correct?
- Nationality is irrelevant to ordinary resumption
- The IBP certificate automatically naturalizes the holder
- Dues payment is a citizenship oath
- Only the certificate’s seal matters
- Professional standing documentation is distinct from citizenship proof
Legal references
- A.M.24-10-05-SC, August12,2025, effective November3,2025, amended Rule138 Sections1–3: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_24-10-05-sc_2025.pdf
- In re Muneses, B.M.2112, July24,2012, MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2012/jul2012/bm_2112_2012.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.