Philippine Bar review · Topic
Rules on the Use of Social Media
Explore Rules on the Use of Social Media in Propriety (Canon IV) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does a judge shed judicial status when using a personal social-media account? Multiple Choice Easy
- What duty does Section 23 impose concerning social-media privacy and security? Multiple Choice Easy
- May a judge use social media to gather outside-record information about a pending case that may influence the decision? Multiple Choice Easy
- A judge uses a platform-permitted pseudonym for recreation, without evading law or the Code. Does Section 27 categorica… Multiple Choice Medium
- A judge spends so much time on recreational social media that hearings and decisions are repeatedly delayed. Does priva… Multiple Choice Medium
- In a small private chat, a judge knowingly circulates a fabricated claim and uses abusive language about a group of lit… Multiple Choice Hard
- A judge discovers online harassment directed at her. She plans an abusive public exchange from her personal account and… Multiple Choice Hard
- Explain why private settings and pseudonyms do not remove judicial social-media responsibilities. Essay Medium
- A judge researches a pending litigant’s social-media history outside the evidence to help decide credibility. Apply the… Essay Medium
- How should a judge reconcile online harassment with the Code’s restraint requirement? Essay Medium
- A judge uses a social-media account to advertise the judge’s private investment for buyers. Which specific social-media… Multiple Choice Easy
- A judge promotes a friend’s commercial venture on the judge’s account but receives no commission. Does absence of perso… Multiple Choice Easy