Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Topic

Preamble; General Provisions

Page 2 of practice questions on Preamble; General Provisions in Standards of Ethical Conduct of Judges and Justices. Browse published questions and explore…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Under the General Provisions, what is the stated effectivity interval after the specified publication and website posti… Multiple Choice Easy
  2. A judicial aspirant presents competence and independence as substitutes for integrity and probity. Does the CJCA Preamb… Multiple Choice Medium
  3. A justice of a collegiate court claims the CJCA Preamble addresses only trial judges because it uses the word judge. Wh… Multiple Choice Medium
  4. A disciplinary respondent contends that the new Code became binding on that respondent only when personally served a pr… Multiple Choice Hard
  5. A judge treats integrity as a narrow synonym for financial honesty and argues that absence of competence or diligence c… Multiple Choice Hard
  6. Explain why proven competence and independence alone do not exhaust the qualifications identified in the 2025 CJCA Prea… Essay Medium
  7. A judicial officer asks whether personal receipt of a printed Code determines its effectivity. State the effectivity me… Essay Medium
  8. A justice claims that integrity concerns financial honesty alone and that diligence is merely optional. Assess that cla… Essay Medium