Philippine Bar review · Topic
Equality (Canon V)
Explore Equality (Canon V) in Standards of Ethical Conduct of Judges and Justices for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does Canon V equality apply only to adjudicative decisions and exclude administrative treatment? Multiple Choice Easy
- What does Canon V Section 2 require concerning stereotypes? Multiple Choice Easy
- Does the equality rule permit reasonable adjustments for vulnerable persons within existing laws and rules? Multiple Choice Easy
- A court user has a communication barrier. The judge considers a reasonable lawful adjustment so the person can particip… Multiple Choice Medium
- A judge learns court staff give favored court users priority solely because of social status. May the judge ignore it b… Multiple Choice Medium
- An elderly court user has a documented physical inability to attend in the ordinary manner. A lawful reasonable arrange… Multiple Choice Hard
- A judge assumes an uneducated witness is necessarily dishonest and treats a professionally qualified witness as automat… Multiple Choice Hard
- Distinguish equal treatment from a ban on all reasonable accommodations. Essay Medium
- What responsibility does a judge have when supervised personnel discriminate against court users? Essay Medium
- Explain why assumptions about nationality, education or financial status cannot replace fair assessment of a court user. Essay Medium
- Does Canon V Section 1 extend the same level of respect, attention and sensitivity to judicial colleagues? Multiple Choice Easy
- A homeless court user seeks access to a remedy. Is homelessness among Section 4’s listed examples of vulnerability? Multiple Choice Easy