Practice question
A court has jurisdiction and resolves conflicting testimony against a party. The party alleges only that a witness should have been believed differently, with no jurisdictional defect or grave abuse shown. Which is best?
- That is ordinarily a merits issue for the proper appeal, not automatic certiorari
- Every credibility disagreement proves grave abuse
- The court retroactively loses subject-matter power
- A new coequal case is always required
- The losing party may declare the judgment nonexistent
Legal references
- G.R.169649/185594, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/jan2023/gr_169649_2023.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.