Philippine Bar review · Topic

Effect of Estoppel

Explore Effect of Estoppel in Subject Matter Jurisdiction for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. According to Figueroa, estoppel by laches barring a subject-matter jurisdiction objection is what?
  2. Which feature was central to the exceptional Tijam history?
  3. Does Figueroa treat delay alone as automatically sufficient for the exceptional laches bar?
  4. A defendant raises lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on appeal, with no considerable delay, tactical advantage or pre…
  5. A court is asked to apply Tijam as though it means every litigant who once sought relief can never question subject-mat…
  6. A party knowingly invokes a court’s authority for many years, seeks affirmative relief, and only after an adverse outco…
  7. An appellant identifies a genuine jurisdiction defect. The appellee proves only that the appellant attended trial under…
  8. State the relationship between the general subject-matter jurisdiction rule and Tijam’s estoppel-by-laches exception.
  9. Why is elapsed time alone insufficient to resolve every estoppel-by-laches jurisdiction question?
  10. A litigant challenges jurisdiction on appeal after ordinary participation but no considerable delay or resulting inequi…
  11. In Tijam, was laches treated merely as a mathematical count of years?
  12. What was the relevant status of the party barred in Tijam?