Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Special Cybercrime Courts

Multiple Choice Hard Jurisprudence

Practice question

Law enforcement establishes a Section4 offense is about to occur in a city and seeks the appropriate warrant from its designated cybercrime court before an information is filed. It satisfies the other applicable warrant requirements. The opponent says only a final conviction gives the court authority to entertain the application. Which distinction controls?
  1. A warrant application is an investigative proceeding expressly contemplated before that claimed final-conviction stage
  2. Final conviction is invariably required
  3. No cybercrime warrant can precede trial
  4. An information automatically proves every warrant ground
  5. Only a sentencing court can ever issue process

Legal references

  • Rule on Cybercrime Warrants AM17-11-03-SC Section2.2: https://oca.judiciary.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/A.M.-No.-17-11-03-SC.pdf
  • OCA Circular131-2019 reproducing Section2.2: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.