Practice question
A landowner properly invokes judicial determination of compensation for land taken under CARP. An adversary calls the SAC merely an appellate reviewer of the administrative valuation. Under Dalauta, which is best?
- The SAC’s just-compensation jurisdiction is original and exclusive, not merely appellate
- The administrative figure is unreviewable in every case
- The SAC has no valuation function
- Only the parties’ compromise can confer power
- Every valuation petition belongs to a municipal court
Legal references
- Land Bank v. Dalauta, G.R.190004, August8 2017, main decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/aug2017/gr_190004_2017.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.