Practice question
A validity challenge concerns an SEC regulation issued in its quasi-legislative capacity. The opponent cites the agency’s Rule43 adjudication appeals as an automatic bar to an RTC original action. Which distinction matters?
- Rule-making validity and adjudicative appellate review are different functions
- Every agency act is necessarily quasi-judicial
- Rule43 makes all regulation challenges impossible
- The SEC becomes a general civil court
- An agency’s involvement always excludes an RTC
Legal references
- Galang v Wallis GR223434 July3,2019 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2019/jul2019/gr_223434_2019.html
- SEC v Bonifacio GR198425 etal January30,2024 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/jan2024/gr_198425_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.