Philippine Bar review · Topic
Barangay Conciliation (RA 7160, Secs. 408–412)
Page 2 of practice questions on Barangay Conciliation (RA 7160, Secs. 408–412) in JURISDICTION. Browse published questions and explore related topics for…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Does Section408 exclude an offense with no private offended party?
- Two residents of different municipalities live in adjoining barangays and agree to the appropriate lupon’s settlement p…
- A covered dispute concerns land spanning two barangays. Under Section409(c), which location matters?
- Parties complete barangay mediation without raising a known venue objection. After conciliation fails, a party claims b…
- An offense is punishable by six months’ imprisonment or a fine exceeding PHP5,000. Counsel argues Section408(c) cannot …
- Distinguish the ordinary cross-municipality exclusion from its adjoining-barangay exception.
- Explain the timing and consequence of a barangay-venue objection under Section409.
- Apply Section409’s distinct venue categories to land disputes and workplace disputes.