Practice question
Does merely obtaining an attachment order necessarily prove that every asset named by the applicant has already been levied upon?
- No; issuance and lawful enforcement are distinct
- Yes; an unserved order physically seizes everything
- Yes; the applicant’s list is conclusive custody
- Yes; every foreign asset is automatically seized
- Yes; no enforcement act is needed
Legal references
- Rules of Court, Rule57 Sections5–7 and Rule39: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
- De Joya v Marquez GR162416 January31,2006 MAIN res-control modes: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2006/jan2006/gr_162416_2006.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.