Philippine Bar review · Topic

Hierarchy of Courts

Explore Hierarchy of Courts in GENERAL PRINCIPLES for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. What does the hierarchy-of-courts doctrine ordinarily require where courts have concurrent original jurisdiction over t…
  2. Under Gios-Samar, merely calling a case transcendental does what to unresolved material factual questions?
  3. Who bears the burden of clearly explaining a claimed basis to bypass the judicial hierarchy?
  4. A petitioner files directly in the Supreme Court solely because it shares original jurisdiction over the remedy, withou…
  5. A constitutional challenge turns on disputed technical market facts requiring reception of evidence. The petitioner ask…
  6. A petition repeats broad constitutional labels but its requested relief requires resolving conflicting accounts of nego…
  7. A litigant presents a genuine legal issue and carefully pleads a recognized exceptional reason for direct resort. The o…
  8. Distinguish concurrent original jurisdiction from compliance with the hierarchy-of-courts doctrine.
  9. Why did Gios-Samar reject using transcendental importance as a substitute for initial fact-finding?
  10. A petitioner claims a recognized exception to hierarchy. What must counsel show beyond a bare assertion that the case i…
  11. What institutional function does Gios-Samar assign to the hierarchy doctrine?
  12. Is a constitutional challenge necessarily reserved for first-instance filing in the Supreme Court merely because it que…