Practice question
The actual judgment obligor files a new RTC case asserting it is a third-party claimant to its own garnished account. It seeks to stop the first RTC’s execution and identifies no genuine independent third-party ownership. Which rule applies?
- The debtor cannot obtain the third-party exception merely by relabeling itself
- The new label necessarily supplies the exception
- Every account owner is a stranger to its own judgment
- A separate case automatically suspends execution
- The second RTC becomes an appellate court
Legal references
- Cabili v Balindong AMRTJ-10-2225 September6,2011 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2011/sep2011/am_rtj-10-2225_2011.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.