Practice question
A second RTC restrains a coequal court’s writ for several days and then dismisses the collateral petition for lack of jurisdiction. It claims the later dismissal means no prohibited interference ever occurred. What follows Cabili?
- Later correction does not erase the earlier improper interference
- Later dismissal retroactively authorizes every TRO
- A short TRO cannot affect a writ
- A coequal RTC has automatic temporary appellate power
- Jurisdiction exists until a judge notices its absence
Legal references
- Cabili v Balindong AMRTJ-10-2225 September6,2011 MAIN: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2011/sep2011/am_rtj-10-2225_2011.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.