Practice question
Two reasonable interpretations of an ambiguous procedural phrase preserve a fair hearing, but one imposes pointless repetitive expense. Explain Rule1 Section6’s interpretive relevance without requesting suspension of a clear rule.
Legal references
- Rules of Court, Rule1 Sections3 and6: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_1-71_civil.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.