Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Concept and Nature of Remedial Law

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A litigant cites the original Fil-Estate decision to deny all retroactive application of the fresh-period rule but ignores the June 25, 2008 reconsideration resolution. Which is correct?
  1. The original decision necessarily controls even after reconsideration changed it.
  2. Reconsideration resolutions can never affect the governing disposition.
  3. Only the party’s preferred passage matters.
  4. A case citation’s year alone settles its operative holding.
  5. The operative reconsideration ruling must be consulted; it recognized the procedural rule’s application to the pending case.

Legal references

  • Spouses De los Santos v. Vda. de Mangubat, G.R. No. 149508, October 10, 2007, main decision, remedial law and pending actions: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2007/oct2007/gr_149508_2007.html
  • Fil-Estate Properties, Inc. v. Homena-Valencia, G.R. No. 173942, June 25, 2008, operative reconsideration resolution, retroactive procedural application: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_173942_2008.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.