Philippine Bar review · Topic
Substantial Evidence
Explore Substantial Evidence in Standards for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or answer flashcards.
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- How does Rule 133, Section 6 define substantial evidence?
- Rule 133, Section 6 expressly identifies substantial evidence in cases filed before which bodies?
- Under Ang Tibay, may an administrative decision rest on a conclusion without the required supporting evidence?
- In an administrative proceeding, a relevant authenticated attendance record and credible firsthand testimony adequately…
- An administrative body finds liability solely because 'a complaint was filed,' with no supporting evidence and no admit…
- A labor tribunal receives late affidavits on appeal without an explanation for the delay and treats their bare denials …
- An agency bases its dispositive factual conclusion on material privately obtained by the decision-maker and never discl…
- Define substantial evidence and distinguish it from proof beyond reasonable doubt.
- Explain why relaxed technical procedure does not remove the substantial-evidence requirement.
- An agency concludes that a charge is proved simply because the respondent's denial seems weak, while the complainant of…
- Under Ang Tibay, do conflicting assertions of counsel automatically have evidentiary value merely because they appear i…
- Does Ang Tibay permit a tribunal simply to adopt a subordinate’s view without independent consideration?