Practice question
A qualified expert's opinion is admitted. The opinion relies on inadequate data, uses an unexplained method, and does not show reliable application to the case. A party argues the expert's credentials compel full belief. Under Rule 133, Section 5, which is correct?
- Credentials automatically bind the judge
- The court must evaluate the data, principles, methods, and their reliable application in assigning weight
- An admitted expert opinion cannot be questioned
- Every expert opinion must be rejected regardless of basis
- The expert alone determines the judgment
Legal references
- https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.pdf — A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, current Rules 128 §3, 130 §§21–22, 131 §1, 133 §§1–2,4–6.
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2013/dec2013/gr_182356_2013.html — Dela Llana v. Biong, G.R. No. 182356, December 4, 2013, MAIN decision (evidentiary facts, ultimate fact, and admissibility versus weight).
- https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/apr2025/gr_265570_2025.html — People v. Akil, G.R. No. 265570, April 7, 2025, MAIN decision (police-initiated private questioning of a detainee and custodial confession).
- https://lawphil.net/consti/cons1987.html — 1987 Constitution, Article III §§2–3,12,14 (exclusionary protections and due process).
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.