Practice question
Assume the Hague Evidence Convention is in force between the relevant States and A.M.25-02-17-SC applies. A company director gave evidence abroad while in that role and later resigned. All other Section18 conditions are met. Does resignation alone erase the time-of-taking category under paragraph(b)?
- No; the relevant status existed when the evidence was taken
- Yes; resignation retroactively erases the testimony
- Yes; only present directors can ever qualify
- Only the company’s stock price matters
- Only the witness’s current address matters
Legal references
- AM25-02-17-SC, March4,2025, Sections1–2,18–20,32–33; applicability conditional on Convention entry into force between relevant States: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/98634
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.