Philippine Bar review · Topic
Scope and Definitions
Explore Scope and Definitions in Taking of Evidence under the Hague Evidence Convention (AM 25-02-17-SC) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What express condition accompanies the scope of A.M. 25-02-17-SC?
- What matters does the stated Chapter I procedure concern?
- What is a Letter of Request under the Rule’s definitions?
- A Philippine litigant asks for a formal outbound Letter of Request in a pending civil matter. Is the litigant personall…
- A proposed request is solely for service of judicial documents abroad. Does the definition of other judicial act automa…
- State A and the Philippines both belong to the HCCH. A party assumes this alone proves that the Evidence Convention is …
- A qualifying foreign Letter seeks evidence located within the Philippines. Counsel identifies the OCA as Central Author…
- State the scope and express international-applicability qualification of A.M. 25-02-17-SC.
- Distinguish Requesting Party, Requesting Authority, Central Authority and Requested Authority under the definitions.
- Describe the evidence covered and identify the excluded acts in the definition of other judicial act.
- Assume the Hague Evidence Convention is in force between the relevant States and A.M.25-02-17-SC applies. Does the defi…
- Assume the Hague Evidence Convention is in force between the relevant States and A.M.25-02-17-SC applies. Can other int…