Practice question
Explain why Cesa does not abolish offer timing merely because it considered identification during cross-examination.
Legal references
- A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, 2019 Amendments to the Revised Rules on Evidence, Rule 132, Sections 19-36 as specifically discussed: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
- Spouses Cesa, substituted by heirs, v. Spouses Brucelas, et al., G.R. No. 255564, March 5, 2025, MAIN decision, qualified relaxation of formal offer and identification in recorded testimony: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/mar2025/gr_255564_2025.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.