Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: When Evidence Offered

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

A document is fully identified in recorded testimony but never incorporated in the case record. Does that satisfy both Cesa requirements?
  1. Yes, identification alone necessarily is incorporation.
  2. Yes, counsel may keep the only copy privately forever.
  3. Yes, the court must reconstruct the document from memory.
  4. No.
  5. Yes, the second requirement has no independent meaning.

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, 2019 Amendments to the Revised Rules on Evidence, Rule 132, Sections 19-36 as specifically discussed: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
  • Spouses Cesa, substituted by heirs, v. Spouses Brucelas, et al., G.R. No. 255564, March 5, 2025, MAIN decision, qualified relaxation of formal offer and identification in recorded testimony: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2025/mar2025/gr_255564_2025.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.