Philippine Bar review · Topic
Tender of Excluded Evidence
Explore Tender of Excluded Evidence in Offer and Objection for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What may the offeror do when a document or thing offered as evidence is excluded under section 40?
- What does section 40 permit the offeror to state for excluded oral evidence?
- Does tender of excluded evidence itself make that evidence admitted for deciding the merits?
- A court excludes a proposed technical report. The proponent wants the record to show exactly what was rejected. What is…
- Counsel tenders excluded oral testimony by saying only that it would help the client. What is missing from the section …
- A party tenders an excluded letter and later asks the trial court to find liability solely from it, without any change …
- A witness is prevented from giving a proposed account. Counsel states the name, relevant personal circumstances and exp…
- State how Rule 132 section 40 treats excluded documents or things and excluded oral testimony.
- Explain why tender of excluded evidence is distinct from its formal offer and admission.
- What should a useful tender of excluded oral testimony communicate, and what should it not be confused with?
- What appellate purpose does Fortune Tobacco identify for a proper tender of excluded evidence?
- Does tender itself guarantee that the appellate court will reverse exclusion?