Practice question
A party supplies a valid explanation for late submission and offers the required fine, but the late material would unduly prejudice the opponent. The party says two conditions automatically compel admission. Which is correct?
- The no-undue-prejudice condition remains independently necessary
- Payment necessarily cures every prejudice
- A valid excuse cancels all other conditions
- The court has no discretion under the rule
- Every late exhibit is automatically truthful
Legal references
- A.M.12-8-8-SC, Judicial Affidavit Rule, Sections2,5–7,10: https://lawphil.net/courts/supreme/am/am_12-8-8-sc_2012.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.