Practice question
An unsigned threatening note is offered as the note actually received, not as a genuine agreement executed by its alleged author. Does Section 20 require the court first to identify the actual purpose before applying its authentic-writing requirement?
- Yes.
- No, every piece of paper has an identical purpose.
- No, the proponent’s claim about the item never matters.
- No, threatening notes must always be contractual instruments.
- No, the court must assume every offered note is genuine authorship proof.
Legal references
- A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, 2019 Amendments to the Revised Rules on Evidence, Rule 132, Sections 19-36 as specifically discussed: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.