Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Who may be Witnesses (See also AM 00-4-07-SC)

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

Is age alone sufficient to require a competency examination of a child under section 6?
  1. No; the Rule requires the specified substantial doubt and proof of necessity when a party seeks the examination.
  2. Yes, every child must always undergo one.
  3. Yes, a lawyer’s preference alone is conclusive.
  4. No; a competency examination is never permitted.
  5. Yes, unless the child is related to the judge.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html — Rule 130 sections 21–22: perception, communication, nondisqualification grounds and personal knowledge.
  • https://lawphil.net/courts/supreme/am/am_004_07_sc_2000.html — Rule on Examination of a Child Witness sections 4, 6–11: child definition, presumption, examination and appropriate assistance.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.