Practice question
A litigant relies on a vague oral promise to pay 'something later' and invokes Section 36 after rejection. Identify why that assertion does not establish the rule's stated tender equivalence.
Legal references
- 2019 Revised Rules on Evidence, Rule 130 Sections 35–36 and Rule 128 Sections 3–4: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.