Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Disqualification of Witnesses

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

An interested witness can perceive and communicate, and no privilege or specific legal bar applies. The opponent invokes the special State-witness rules even though no accused-discharge procedure is sought. Which is sound?
  1. Every interested witness automatically must be an accused seeking discharge.
  2. Interest alone is not general disqualification; the special discharge conditions should not be indiscriminately imposed on ordinary testimony.
  3. All ordinary witnesses must satisfy every Section 17 condition.
  4. Only witnesses with no personal stake can ever testify.
  5. A prosecutor can forbid testimony solely by calling it State-witness evidence.

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, 2019 Amendments to the Revised Rules on Evidence, current Rule 130, Sections 10-24 as specified: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
  • Rules of Court, Rule 119, Section 17, special conditions for discharge as State witness: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.