Philippine Bar review · Topic
Requisites for Admissibility
Explore Requisites for Admissibility in Object or Real Evidence for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz or…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- What basic conditions govern admissibility under Rule 128 Section 3?
- Under Rule 130 Section 1, object evidence is addressed to what?
- Why is authentication ordinarily necessary before an object may be considered as evidence?
- A mechanic recognizes a machine part by a distinctive fracture that he observed during the accident. He identifies it i…
- A proponent authenticates a seized object, but the court finds that it was obtained through an unconstitutional search …
- A witness brings a knife purchased after an assault and says it resembles the weapon, but claims it is the very knife t…
- A stolen engine is uniquely numbered. The recovering officer and custodian identify that engine and explain its handlin…
- A broken helmet is offered in a collision case. State the foundations needed before it can support a finding about the …
- Explain why an object’s physical presence in the courtroom does not by itself establish admissibility.
- A distinctive firearm is identified by officers who explain its recovery and turnover. Must every requirement for seize…
- Why do fungible objects pose a special authentication concern under Olarte?
- Can an object be made identifiable by a mark placed upon recovery rather than having an original serial number?