Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Parol Evidence

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

The opponent timely invokes Section 10. The offeror cites Paras’s historical pleading language to avoid the current verified-pleading requirement for the exception. Which is sound?
  1. The 2015 quotation repeals the 2019 amendment.
  2. Verification is never part of the current text.
  3. The offeror may choose whichever version is less demanding.
  4. A citation itself verifies every pleading.
  5. Apply current Section 10; the older case does not erase the later verification requirement.

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, 2019 Amendments to the Revised Rules on Evidence, current Rule 130, Sections 10-24 as specified: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
  • Spouses Paras v. Kimwa Construction and Development Corp., G.R. No. 171601, April 8, 2015, MAIN decision, relevance and waiver; use current Section 10 verified-pleading requirement rather than historical Section 9 text: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2015/apr2015/gr_171601_2015.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.