Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Parol Evidence

Multiple Choice Easy

Practice question

Does properly pleading a parol-evidence exception automatically make unrelated proposed evidence relevant?
  1. Yes, every unrelated matter becomes admissible.
  2. No.
  3. Yes, the pleading itself supplies every evidentiary foundation.
  4. Yes, relevance is abolished for the entire trial.
  5. Yes, the opposing party loses every objection.

Legal references

  • A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC, 2019 Amendments to the Revised Rules on Evidence, current Rule 130, Sections 10-24 as specified: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
  • Spouses Paras v. Kimwa Construction and Development Corp., G.R. No. 171601, April 8, 2015, MAIN decision, relevance and waiver; use current Section 10 verified-pleading requirement rather than historical Section 9 text: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2015/apr2015/gr_171601_2015.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.