Philippine Bar review · Topic

Uniformity of Evidentiary Rules

Page 2 of practice questions on Uniformity of Evidentiary Rules in General Provisions and Principles (Rule 128). Browse published questions and explore…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Are both relevance and applicable exclusion part of the ordinary common admissibility baseline?
  2. Two regular trial branches apply the same Section3 rule. One excludes an exhibit because an established privilege appli…
  3. A valid special rule applies only after a specified condition is met. A proponent concedes the condition is absent but …
  4. One branch announces that relevant evidence excluded by an applicable rule will be admitted solely because that branch …
  5. Identical disputed expert opinions reach two courts. Both apply Rule133 Section5’s listed factors but evaluate the reli…
  6. Distinguish uniform evidentiary rules from identical admissibility outcomes for materially different facts.
  7. A litigant invokes a special evidentiary rule while conceding its express triggering condition is absent. Explain the S…
  8. A trial branch relies on local custom alone to disregard an applicable exclusion. No waiver or lawful exception is pres…