Practice question
A party offers an item admittedly irrelevant to every issue and subject to no alternative factual connection. It argues that Section1’s broad definition compels admission because the item physically exists. Which is correct?
- The definition does not dispense with the relevance requirement
- Physical existence makes every object admissible
- Every exhibit number supplies relevance
- An irrelevant item automatically proves credibility
- Only the opposing party can define the Rules
Legal references
- A.M.19-08-15-SC, 2019 amended Rules on Evidence, effective May1,2020, Rules128,130,131 and133: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/pdf/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.pdf
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.