Practice question
After tenancy begins, competent proof shows the landlord conveyed title to another. Is the tenant barred solely by Section2(b) from raising that later conveyance?
- No; the recognized subsequent-change qualification must be considered
- Yes; every future title event is conclusively irrelevant
- Yes; the Rule permanently freezes title for all purposes
- Only the original lease date can ever be proved
- Only a newspaper report can establish a conveyance
Legal references
- AM19-08-15-SC, current Rule130 Section54; Rule131 Sections1–3,5–6; Rule133 Section1: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
- Laqui v Sagun, GR271967, November4,2024, MAIN opinion, tenant estoppel and genuine subsequent change of title: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2024/nov2024/gr_271967_2024.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.