Philippine Bar review · Topic

Burden of Proof vs. Burden of Evidence

Page 2 of practice questions on Burden of Proof vs. Burden of Evidence in Burden of Proof and Presumptions (Rule 131). Browse published questions and explore…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Does the burden-of-proof definition itself select one universal quantum for every kind of proceeding?
  2. A plaintiff seeks a loan balance. The defendant separately counterclaims for damage allegedly caused to machinery. Does…
  3. A counterclaimant presents no evidence of an essential damages fact and argues the opponent’s weak response cures the o…
  4. A plaintiff claims damages for defective goods, and the defendant asserts a distinct unpaid-price counterclaim. The cou…
  5. A civil claimant proves one necessary element but omits another. Counsel says the opponent’s production of rebuttal on …
  6. Explain how the same litigant may defend a complaint while bearing a burden on an affirmative counterclaim.
  7. Why does rebuttal on one element not automatically supply proof of a different omitted element?
  8. Explain why Rule131 Section1 refers to the amount of evidence required by law instead of defining the same quantum for …