Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Conditional Admissibility

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

The court’s stated condition is later met by competent connecting evidence. Does this make the original item automatically sufficient to win the whole case?
  1. Yes, one fulfilled condition decides every element.
  2. Yes, credibility can no longer be assessed.
  3. No; satisfying the condition resolves that foundation, while other admissibility requirements and evidentiary weight remain.
  4. No; conditional evidence must always be excluded even after compliance.
  5. Yes, every defense is waived.

Legal references

  • https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html — Rule 128 sections 3–4; Rule 130 section 31; Rule 132 section 39: required connection, conspiracy foundation and striking improper evidence.
  • https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1955/nov1955/gr_l-9181_1955.html — People v. Yatco, G.R. L-9181, November 28, 1955, main opinion: provisional reception on a promised later connection, subject to final exclusion requirements.

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.