Practice question
A machine record is provisionally received subject to proof it concerns machine M. Later competent evidence identifies it as concerning a different unrelated machine N. Has the stated identity connection been established?
- No; the later proof fails the specified connection
- Yes; every machine is interchangeable
- Yes; any serial number is enough
- Yes; counsel’s original promise overrides the proof
- Yes; admission can never be revisited
Legal references
- AM19-08-15-SC, effectiveMay1,2020, Rules128 Sections3–4;129 Section4;130 Sections21–22,28,37;132 Sections34,39: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/am_19-08-15-sc_2019.html
- People v Yatco, GRL-9181, November28,1955, MAIN opinion, conditional reception and final exclusion, read with current evidence rules: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1955/nov1955/gr_l-9181_1955.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.