Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Remedy When Accused is Not Brought to Trial Within the Time Limit

Multiple Choice Hard

Practice question

An accused moves before trial for dismissal solely by adding every elapsed day. The prosecution establishes that specified days qualify for exclusion under Section 3. The accused insists excluded time must count because every delay is necessarily unlawful. Which is correct?
  1. All elapsed time must count regardless of legal exclusions
  2. The court must assess the proved exclusions when resolving the Section 9 motion; raw elapsed time alone is not decisive
  3. Any assertion of exclusion automatically defeats every motion
  4. All defense-caused delay must count against the prosecution without analysis
  5. The court must convict to resolve the delay issue

Legal references

  • Rules of Court, Rule 119, Sections 3–4 and 9–10.
  • Reviewed primary authority, Rule 119, Sections 3–4 and 9–10; no obsolete transitional numeric periods asserted: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.