Practice question
In Malacat, did the Court accept rapidly moving eyes alone as an adequate factual justification?
- No; it rejected that asserted basis on the record
- Yes; eye movement always permits a frisk
- Yes; it conclusively proves possession of a weapon
- Only when the observer is in uniform
- Only after a newspaper report
Legal references
- Malacat v Court of Appeals, GR123595, December12,1997, MAIN opinion, stop-and-frisk grounds and limits: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/dec1997/gr_123595_1997.html
- Esquillo v People, GR182010, August25,2010, MAIN opinion, concrete suspicious conduct and attempted flight: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/aug2010/gr_182010_2010.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.