Practice question
Contrast Malacat’s treatment of the asserted observations with Esquillo’s reliance on concrete conduct, without converting either case into an automatic rule for every encounter.
Legal references
- Malacat v Court of Appeals, GR123595, December12,1997, MAIN opinion, stop-and-frisk grounds and limits: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/dec1997/gr_123595_1997.html
- Esquillo v People, GR182010, August25,2010, MAIN opinion, concrete suspicious conduct and attempted flight: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2010/aug2010/gr_182010_2010.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.