Practice question
An officer asserts that years of experience permit a frisk of anyone at random without identifying any surrounding condition supporting concealed weapons. The prosecution says experience alone is conclusive. Which is best?
- Every experienced officer has unlimited frisk authority
- Experience informs assessment of actual circumstances; it does not eliminate the need for a genuine supported reason
- Experience can never be considered
- A uniform conclusively proves weapons are present
- The target must first physically resist to preserve any right
Legal references
- People v. Sapla, G.R.244045, June16 2020: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2020/jun2020/gr_244045_2020.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.