Practice question
Does Sapla prohibit all genuinely routine, minimally intrusive public-transport security inspections?
- Yes, every visual terminal inspection is necessarily unconstitutional.
- No; it distinguishes that context from the unsupported intrusive search it invalidated.
- Yes, Saluday was erased without distinction.
- Yes, no public-safety screening can ever occur.
- Yes, the Court required conviction before every bag can be inspected.
Legal references
- People v. Sapla, G.R. No. 244045, June 16, 2020, EN BANC MAIN decision, distinguishing Saluday and an intrusive anonymous-tip search: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2020/jun2020/gr_244045_2020.html
- Saluday v. People, G.R. No. 215305, April 3, 2018, EN BANC MAIN decision: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2018/apr2018/gr_215305_2018.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.