Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Airport and Seaport Security Searches

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

May Canton’s airport-security holding simply be replaced by asking only whether the packages were already in plain view before screening?
  1. Yes, plain view is the only possible search doctrine at any airport.
  2. Yes, concealed items may never be discovered through authorized screening.
  3. Yes, a detector may operate only after the contents are visible.
  4. Yes, the security context is irrelevant in every case.
  5. No; the Court considered a distinct security-search justification.

Legal references

  • People v. Canton, G.R. No. 148825, December 27, 2002, MAIN decision, airport-security doctrine (not its superseded RA 6425 penalty): https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2002/dec2002/gr_148825_2002.html

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.