Practice question
During warrant execution an officer intentionally interferes with audio-video capture and later manipulates the recording. The officer argues that camera rules can never entail accountability if a valid warrant existed. Which is best?
- Rule3 Section7 expressly contemplates contempt and preserves other appropriate proceedings
- A warrant excuses intentional manipulation
- Every malfunction is necessarily intentional misconduct
- Only the suspect can be liable for recording issues
- Accountability automatically proves every charged crime against the suspect
Legal references
- AM21-06-08-SC Rule3 Section7; PDFp706: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/assets/pdf/journals/Collation_and_Codification_of_SC_Issuance_DIGITAL.pdf
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.