Log In Create Account

Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Motion to Quash Warrant or Suppress Evidence

Multiple Choice Easy Jurisprudence

Practice question

Under Stonehill, is the constitutional objection to an unreasonable search generally a personal right?
  1. Yes.
  2. No, anyone may automatically assert every stranger’s right.
  3. No, only police officers possess it.
  4. No, corporate personality is irrelevant to every challenge.
  5. No, a shareholder automatically owns every corporate constitutional claim.

Legal references

  • Stonehill v. Diokno, G.R. No. L-19550, June 19, 1967, MAIN decision, personal constitutional right and separate corporate personality: https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1967/jun1967/gr_l-19550_1967.html
  • People v. Lavarias, G.R. No. 273582, June 9, 2026, MAIN decision, substantial record basis and serious warrant defect; its warrant was issued and implemented in 2017: https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/70534

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.