Philippine Bar review · Topic

Effect of Illegal Search and Seizure

Page 2 of practice questions on Effect of Illegal Search and Seizure in Search and Seizure (Rule 126). Browse published questions and explore related topics…

Explore the syllabus

Direct subtopics

This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.

Put it into practice

Practice questions

  1. Did later delivery of privately discovered material to authorities necessarily convert Marti’s earlier independent priv…
  2. Police instruct a private courier to open a particular customer’s parcel as their investigative agent. May the prosecut…
  3. Evidence survives a Marti-based constitutional objection because the initial search was genuinely private. Does that al…
  4. A private person’s conduct is outside Marti’s constitutional exclusion rationale. Does the decision necessarily declare…
  5. A privately employed guard performs a State-directed terminal-security function. Is private employment alone enough to …
  6. Explain the constitutional significance of the private initiative in Marti.
  7. Police ask a courier to open a named suspect’s parcel. Why is Marti not an automatic answer to the exclusion claim?
  8. Why does rejection of a Marti-based exclusion objection neither automatically convict the accused nor immunize the priv…