Philippine Bar review · Topic
Rights of Accused at Trial
Explore Rights of Accused at Trial in Rights of Accused (Rule 115) for the Philippine Bar. Browse subtopics and published practice questions, then take a quiz…
Explore the syllabus
Direct subtopics
This topic has no further subtopics. Explore its practice questions below.
Put it into practice
Practice questions
- Under Rule 115, when is the presumption of innocence overcome?
- Which right allows an accused to secure attendance of defense witnesses and production of evidence?
- How must the accused's choice not to testify be treated under Rule 115?
- An accused voluntarily testifies on direct examination about the incident. What does Rule 115 provide regarding cross-e…
- An accused moves to defend personally without counsel. What does Rule 115 require before the court may allow this?
- After arraignment, an accused receives notice of trial but deliberately stays away without justification. The accused l…
- An accused in custody escapes before the next trial dates. The defense asserts that each subsequent trial must be postp…
- Explain the accused's right not to testify and the consequence of choosing to testify under Rule 115.
- Discuss the right to be present and defend with counsel under Rule 115, including unjustified absence and escape from c…
- Identify the trial rights in Rule 115 that permit an accused to understand and contest the prosecution's case and prese…
- Under Rule115, is prior testimony from an administrative proceeding categorically excluded merely because it was not ju…
- For the prior-testimony provision in Rule115, whose opportunity to cross-examine matters?