Practice question
A complainant shows only that the accused plans an ordinary domestic relocation and has a pending criminal charge. It invokes Section 2(a), with no absconding from the Philippines or other ground established. Which is sound?
- Those facts alone do not establish the specifically invoked absconding-from-the-Philippines ground.
- Every domestic move necessarily is absconding abroad.
- A pending charge itself proves every attachment ground.
- The complainant may freeze assets without judicial process.
- The accused’s furniture becomes the complainant’s property immediately.
Legal references
- Rules of Court, Rule 127, Sections 1-2 and Rule 111, as applicable: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.