Practice question
Did the main ruling in CICL XXX treat the failure to allege discernment as an automatic ground for acquittal in that case?
- Yes, it granted acquittal solely on that omission.
- No.
- Yes, it adopted every dissent as the judgment.
- Yes, it refused to consider waiver.
- Yes, it held no appellate review was possible.
Legal references
- Rules of Court, Rule 110, Sections 7-15; Rule 116, Section 9; Rule 117, Sections 3(f) and 9; Rule 120, Section 3, as relevant: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
- CICL XXX v. People, G.R. No. 238798, March 14, 2023, EN BANC MAIN decision, especially its discussion of pleading discernment and waiver (not the separate dissenting opinions): https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2023/mar2023/gr_238798_2023.html
Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.