Philippine Bar review · Question

Practice question: Duplicity of the Offense

Multiple Choice Medium

Practice question

Two offenses are alleged with facts establishing that one is a necessary means to commit the other within Article 48. Does the mere presence of two offense components inevitably establish prohibited duplicity?
  1. Yes, Article 48 never interacts with Rule 110.
  2. Yes, every necessary-means allegation requires automatic acquittal.
  3. Yes, no complex crime may be charged in one information.
  4. No; the legally applicable single-punishment rule must be considered.
  5. Yes, a court must ignore the statutory relationship.

Legal references

  • Rules of Court, Rule 110, Sections 7-15; Rule 116, Section 9; Rule 117, Sections 3(f) and 9; Rule 120, Section 3, as relevant: https://lawphil.net/courts/rules/rc_110-127_crim.html
  • Revised Penal Code, Article 48, as amended by Act 4000 (grave or less grave felonies), official consolidated text: https://pcw.gov.ph/act-no-3815-the-revised-penal-code/

Answer this question in flashcards to review your response and continue practicing.